I need help... CASE STUDY

[_Jiro]

Pede po bang magpatulong sa case study ko.. Wala po kasi ak0ng idea kung an0 ang gagawin k0 dito. First time k0 lang kasi nagka case study... Eto po yung binigay saken..



A public agency retains the services of ABC Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge. ABC Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engr. Enriquez, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge. Engr. Enriquez's scope of work is solely to identify a pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to ABC for further review and repair.

Three months prior to the beginning of the scheduled overhaul of the bridge, while across the bridge, SP03 Manik Manoog loses control of his patrol car. The vehicle crashed into the bridge wall. The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing SP03 Manik Manoog.

While conducting the bridge inspection, and although not part of the scope of services for which he was retained, Engr. Enriquez notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall close to where the accident involving SP03 Manik Manoog occured. Engr. Enriquez surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes. Engr. Enriquez verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency. The public agency contacts ABC Architecs and Engineers which then contacts Engr. Enriquez and asks Engr. Enriquez not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work. Engr. Enriquez states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested. Engr. Enriquez does not report this information to any other public agency or authority.

[_Jiro]

Patulong naman po dito

[_Jiro]

^

[_Jiro]

Wala bang nakakaalam kung pano toh...

[rdpzycho]

anong kailangan dito?

[Supremo Mayor Kuya Johnaray]

Hmmmmm...

I have one question

1) What is the main question... Given the detail but no question then there is no answer.

.... anyway reading the whole scenario, I bet Engr. Enriquez should include it on his personal inspection copy but I bet he should also secure a police report concluding the incident just incase Issue arise involving the project, In the government now a days someone will find whose to blaime for a certain fault... at least he have proof that the incident occur before his project.... Where is the SOCO (Scene of the crime operatives)?

[_Jiro]

Nagtan0ng ako sa clasmate ko kung an0 gagawin jan. Sabi nya hanapin ko daw ung problem tapos gawa daw ako ng conclusi0n tapos gawa daw ako ng rec0mmendation/s0luti0n base dun sa pr0blem. C0ntracts and ethics kasi ang subject ko kaya kelangan ko siguro hanapin kung may problema sa c0ntract?

Nkalagay kasi jan ang sc0pe ng work ni engr. Enriquez is to identify a pavement  damage on the bridge then rep0rt it to ABC. Eh ung nakita nyang pre existing c0ndition on the wall, hindi po ba nya sc0pe yun?

Siguro yung pin0st ni j0hnaray pede k0 nang gawing s0luti0n/rec0mmendati0n. Ung pr0blem nalang kelangan ko