R.A.7925, Article 5, Section 15

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

Guys baka pde ny0 ko 2lungan dit0 sa rep0rt ko.. Hehe pde paki explain kung an0 ibig sbihin nit0... Report ko kasi t0h kaso hirap ako makapgexplain ng mga  ganyan eh..

Sec.15. Radio Frequency Spectrum - the radio frequency spectrum allocation and assignment shall be subject to periodic review. The use thereof shall be subject to reasonable spectrum user fees. Where demand for specific frequencies exceed availability, the Commission shall hold open tenders for the same and ensure wider access to this limited resource.

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

Patur0 naman...

[maldihtah13]

bigay mo muna number mo!

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

bigay mo muna number mo!

Lalake po aq.. Ahehe

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

2ruan ny0 naman aq... Bka masab0n aq ni sir cabarios mamaya... T_T

[maldihtah13]

eh di yung number na lang ng nasa avatar mo.

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

Nkita ko lng yan sa friendster dati. Di q klala yan

[penny]

2ruan ny0 naman aq... Bka masab0n aq ni sir cabarios mamaya... T_T

Dont worry mabait naman yan si Sir Cabarrios........

Hanapin mo ung Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) ng RA na yan - malamang meron kang makikitang idea dun........

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

Paexplain nman nit0ng secti0n 15... Pg kasi aq nagexplain mga ilang w0rds lng masasabi ko..

What is the purpose of this law?
 Sino-sin0 ba ang sak0p ng law na yan
Sin0 nagaassign ng freq spectrum allocation?
Bakit kelangan ng periodic review?
San napupunta ung spectrum user fees? Knin0 nagbabayad?

An0 ibig sbihin nito?:
"Where demand for specific frequencies exceed availability, the Commission shall hold open tenders for the same and ensure wider access to this limited resource.
"

[rdpzycho]

purpose: regulation at assignment ng spectrum of frequencies dito sa Pilipinas.
sakop: lahat ng entities na gumagamit ng RF such as, but not limited to, broadcast stations, mobile communications
sino: NTC
bakit may periodic review: kung may bagong technology or kung may outdated na siyempre kailangang ayusin 'yung utilization.

open tender = bid. like broadcast, alangan namang lahat mag-broadcast sa isang frequency, dadami ang interference.

'yung bayad, check the IRR as penny suggested.

[ef - el - ay - pee]

Spectrum is an important and limited resource that is why it should be regulated. It must be regularly reviewed to adjust to emerging technology and global spectrum utilization trends. It is also a big and constant source of income for the government, thus, it is made to follow the law of supply and demand to ensure maximum profit.

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

Whew! Nkara0s din.
Tenkyu po sir rdpzycho, efelaypee, penny
Tenkyu tenkyu ^^,

[rdpzycho]

no problem. good luck sa report.

[penny]

Whew! Nkara0s din.
Tenkyu po sir rdpzycho, efelaypee, penny
Tenkyu tenkyu ^^,

sabi ko naman sayo eh mabait yang prof mo..... hehehehe yun nga lang pag quiz dapat talagang magaral kasi nakakahiya kung lowest ka........ naalala ko dati lowest to highest ang seating arrangement after ng quiz... ganon parin ba sya?

[ckiana02]

Braodcast companies, Business Entities, companies, even individuals can apply for frequency use i.e radio stations, tv stations, meralco etc.
We use to have a satellite comms and we were paying around 10k to NTC for its use.

Why regulate it?  Meralco used to own (use) the 2.4 GHz frequency.  If that rule is not in place then we will not be able to use bluetooth protocol since it uses that frequency. 

There are free frequencies like 27 MHz, 49 MHz, 433 MHz etc. for general use.

:-)

[rdpzycho]

BTW, dati nakakahingi ng spectrum usage sa NTC in the form of Excel file. student pa ako nung last akong humingi at nagpadala naman sila. from ELF to 60GHz ang nasa list, IIRC. at nasa Meralco pa 'yung 2.4GHz.

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

sabi ko naman sayo eh mabait yang prof mo..... hehehehe yun nga lang pag quiz dapat talagang magaral kasi nakakahiya kung lowest ka........ naalala ko dati lowest to highest ang seating arrangement after ng quiz... ganon parin ba sya?

Yup. Gan0n pa din. Nung una mlapit aq sa unahan pg quiz. Ngaun palay0 na ng palay0 dun sa lik0d.. Hehe d pa kc q sanay kung pan0 sya mgpaquiz nung una eh.

[,,V, (@_@) ,V,,]

Ung sa mga rem0te c0ntrol cars ba kapag mas mataas ung freq. mas malayo ba ung range? 27MHz at 49MHz un dba? So mas malay0 mararating nung 49MHz na k0tse? Tama b?

[rdpzycho]

^ not necessarily. in fact, the lower the frequency the lower the Free Space Loss at mas nakaka-tagos on some objects (like 'yung wireless internet, Canopy in 900MHz nakakatagos sa puno pero 'yung gamit dito na 5.6GHz kailangan LOS talaga).

minsan ang nagiging factor kaya kung bakit mukhang mas malayo 'yung 49MHz kaysa sa 27MHz dahil sa antenna. 'yung 49MHz needs only almost half nung sa 27MHz.

http://www.comsearch.com/satellite/tools_fsl.jsp

check the site. at 10km, 27MHz, ang loss ay 81.03dB. at 10km, 49MHz, ang loss ay 86.2dB, mas malaki na ang loss nung sa 49MHz. halos 5.2dB ang difference almost 4x power ang difference nilang dalawa.

[ef - el - ay - pee]

BTW, dati nakakahingi ng spectrum usage sa NTC in the form of Excel file. student pa ako nung last akong humingi at nagpadala naman sila. from ELF to 60GHz ang nasa list, IIRC. at nasa Meralco pa 'yung 2.4GHz.

meron din sila nung parang diagram yung maraming colors, hehe. . nabasa ko dati sa IEEE Spectrum na malaking source of income ito ng US.